по сравнению с 28-704
по сравнению с 35-804-5.6
есть у кого такой?


MF SMS PENTAX 45-125/4
Автор mYxuS, 28 Apr 2003 15:04
Сообщений в теме: 3
#2
Отправлено 28 April 2003 - 15:04
Цитата
Quote: from mYxuS on 4:14 pm on April 28, 2003
по сравнению с 28-704
по сравнению с 35-804-5.6
есть у кого такой?
по сравнению с 28-704
по сравнению с 35-804-5.6
есть у кого такой?
Из www.concentric.net/~Smhalpin/
45-125 mm f/4.0
Steve Scott - I've found it has excellent contrast and sharpness
[and then added later . . .] I've used my Pentax 45-125 for over 20 years now. It is my favoritelens. Not the fastest or lightest lens I own but very handy focal range and sharp as a tack for a zoom. I've owned some non-Pentax zooms in the 80-200mm range but this one beats them hands down. I rarely go anywhere without it. Haven't tried it for portraits. I'd probably want something softer and a little faster to control DOF.
- - - - - -
Pat White - I used a 45-125 for over 15 years and was quite pleased with it. When I bought it used from a photography instructor, the zoom ring was a little loose (guess it was a high-miler), but it never got any worse. I noticed a little pincushion distortion at 125mm, but other than that it seemed fine. By today's standards, who knows? Anyway, I liked the focal length range (it was my everyday lens) and the constant aperture, as well as the constant focus (focus sharply at 125, then zoom back to the length you need). When I got my MZ-5n in '97, I got new lenses to go with it and gave the MX outfit (camera, M 28/2.8, M 50/2.0, K 45-125/4.0, M 200/4.0, K T6-2X doubler, plus flash, etc.) to my daughter, who was a reporter/photographer for a small newspaper in northern Ontario at the time. As far as I know, she's still using it.
Только зачем? Большой, тяжелый, да и диапазон кажется не очень удобным. Себе бы, наверное, брать бы не стал... Хотя, в паре с 70-210/4.0 смотрелось бы хорошо...

Количество пользователей, читающих эту тему: 1
0 пользователей, 1 гостей, 0 анонимных