Как известно, Пентакс для штатников (50/1.4, 50/1.7) позиционирует бленды (сорри за отсутствие точных букв - пишу с мобилы из Москвы) - "квадратную" (крепится зажимом, стоит около 28 у.е.), круглую пластмассовую (тип PH) с резьбой (стоит 3 у.е.) и некую резиновую (тип RH - rubber hood, то бишь).
Внимание вопрос - что это за бленда и каково ее полное наименование?
Публикации Mikko
64 публикаций создано Mikko (учитываются публикации только с 04-June 14)
По типу контента
По пользователю
#10118 Родные пентаксовские бленды
Отправлено от
в 30 November 2001 - 10:40
in
Оптика с байонетом K
#6989 Cable Switch Adapter
Отправлено от
в 30 November 2001 - 10:31
in
Фотопринадлежности
Видно вопрос оказался таким сложным,что пришлось самому провести расследование (а вопрос предлагаю Дену включить в экзаменационные билеты для приема в клуб пентаксистов).
Итак, сей продукт предназначен (как показали вчера лабораторные опыты в Новом Колизее в Москве) для (внимание!) подключения тросика MZ-S к камерам типа MZ-5n и т.п. То есть, если кто-то хочет тросик для 5-ки не за 28 у.е., а за 72+42=114 у.е., то самое время прикупить...
Итак, сей продукт предназначен (как показали вчера лабораторные опыты в Новом Колизее в Москве) для (внимание!) подключения тросика MZ-S к камерам типа MZ-5n и т.п. То есть, если кто-то хочет тросик для 5-ки не за 28 у.е., а за 72+42=114 у.е., то самое время прикупить...
#6992 Cable Switch Adapter
Отправлено от
в 28 November 2001 - 13:04
in
Фотопринадлежности
Кто может объяснить, что это такое
"Cable Switch Adapter CA-10, цена 42 у.е.. Переходник электронного тросика Pentax Cable Switch F или FDP для камеры MZ-S"
Означает ли это, что тросик от MZ-5n можно через этот переходник использовать для MZ-S? Или как?
"Cable Switch Adapter CA-10, цена 42 у.е.. Переходник электронного тросика Pentax Cable Switch F или FDP для камеры MZ-S"
Означает ли это, что тросик от MZ-5n можно через этот переходник использовать для MZ-S? Или как?
#67889 LowePro Stealth Reporter 600AW
Отправлено от
в 26 November 2001 - 09:11
in
Фотопринадлежности
Жилет - это хорошо, но как в нем в мороз в - 25С, а то и больше. На ватник не оденешь. Кстати, серия Trekker это и есть рюкзаки. На природе так получается, что один черт всю сумку вывернешь на землю - то одно хочешь приладить, то другое. А рюкзачишко, он так открывается, что сразу на две части и все доступно (это я себя уговариваю с расстаться и аргументы для жены готовлю. Кстати, про скалиоз - это хорошо...). Можно на www.lowepro.com в увеличенном виде все посмотреть, там хорошие превьюшки.
#67881 LowePro Stealth Reporter 600AW
Отправлено от
в 24 November 2001 - 14:37
in
Фотопринадлежности
Полезную тему развили. У меня Nova 3, туда 2 камеры с 4 объективами влазит. Плюс фильтры, пленки и пр. Сумки эти, факт, супер. Сейчас у меня тоже творческие муки наступают - скоро за Полярный круг предоставится возможность съездить, так хочу (чтобы все сразу влезло) взять Lower Nature или Mini Trekker (размер почти одинаков - цена разная, почему, еще не понял). Они под сиденье самолета отлично влезают. К ним и штатив можно присобачить (правда я под него на фотоярмарке наш чехол Samopal Inc с ремнем всего за 100 р купил). Ни у кого таких нет? Интересно, как они с точки зрения удобства и оперативности. Если куплю, то потом напишу о впечатлениях.
#41312 80-320 - вопрос!
Отправлено от
в 14 November 2001 - 16:07
in
В помощь начинающим
Привет всем!
Вот вопросик в тему. Как известно 80-320 это великолепный объектив (личный опыт), но имеющий один недостаток - при положении камеры вниз (скажем, на плече) он, зараза, выдвигается и подвергает риску себя хряпнуть о какой-нибудь угол. Как наше community с этим борется? Может его изолентой или еще чего? Хочется, однако, более красивого решения....
Вот вопросик в тему. Как известно 80-320 это великолепный объектив (личный опыт), но имеющий один недостаток - при положении камеры вниз (скажем, на плече) он, зараза, выдвигается и подвергает риску себя хряпнуть о какой-нибудь угол. Как наше community с этим борется? Может его изолентой или еще чего? Хочется, однако, более красивого решения....
#16771 Вспышку для MZ-30 посоветуйте
Отправлено от
в 09 November 2001 - 11:13
in
Фотопринадлежности
Ну, в общем, согласен. Не покупать же сумки каждый раз. Глянул ради интереса опять в каталог - вращается вниз и 40-й Метц (но до -13! Надо же хоть какую-то гадость найти!). У него, кстати, есть синхронизация по 2-й шторке?
#16770 Вспышку для MZ-30 посоветуйте
Отправлено от
в 09 November 2001 - 10:40
in
Фотопринадлежности
Смотря какие. Судя по их последнему каталогу, то, что сравнимо с 280-й (по вращению) , начинается от 54-го Metz'a. Но у него и размер на 500-й Пентакс тянет. А 280-я по размеру сравнима с 32-м. Но он и по характеристикам рядом с 280-й не стоял. Это я все только к тому,что размер 280-й и ее техданные очень и очень согласуются.
#16777 Вспышку для MZ-30 посоветуйте
Отправлено от
в 09 November 2001 - 09:36
in
Фотопринадлежности
Маленькое замечание по поводу "отстойной" 280-й. Именно эта "отстойность" (не считая, конечно, "отстойной" возможности поворачиваться во все стороны и на 15 градусов ВНИЗ для МАКРО, чего нет ни у кого!) была для меня решающей при ее покупке - найдите еще вспышку, которая ТАК ложится в кофр! В моей LowerPro Nova 3 как-будто специально для нее место выделено. Или вы вспышки в отдельной сумке носите? Да и продается она везде...Ну и насмешили!
#67640 Первые итоги и благодарности
Отправлено от
в 07 November 2001 - 17:22
in
Поздравления
Присоединяюсь! Отличная навигация, ясность и отсутствие лиц кавка... тьфу! каноновской национальности!
#24048 MZ-S vs Z1p
Отправлено от
в 05 November 2001 - 16:57
in
Пленочные камеры с байонетом K
Второй коммент читал после или до? Вроде часть вопросов снята.
#24047 MZ-S vs Z1p
Отправлено от
в 05 November 2001 - 16:51
in
Пленочные камеры с байонетом K
Вдогонку!!!!
Ответ Чемберлену одного из пользователей. Может кто чего добавит?
Just read test report of the Popular Photography - November issue, PLUS my own findings about the flash exposure compensation functions, here are somethings worth to mention:-
> Viewfinder:
> MZ-S = too small, it seems you are photographing with a point-and-shoot camera
> Z1p = more confortable and bigger image.
> SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Actual image area coverage by the viewfinder of
MZ-S = 93%, Z1p = 87% and Z1p's finder is a little bit brighter
> Built-in flash compensation:
> MZ-S = no
> Z1p = yes, selectabte +/- 1/2 stop, VERY useful, since the Pentax flashes tends to overexposure.
> SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 2
I believe that all pentax AF SLR can do this, SIMPLY USE the exposure compensation button or dial!! Unbelieveable?
Both my two Pentax AF SLRs (MZ-30 and SFX) CAN DO flash exposure compensation. I had tested by using my delicated flash unit AF240FT
The test is very simple. I fired the flash to a plain wall at a certain distance in dark environment and check if the "correct exposure" indication lamp was lit up, after that I set the exposure compensation to "over", say +4EV. So, what're the results? The "correct exposure" indication lamp didn't light up then. What does this imply? => Flash Exposure Compensation is in action!
SO, if you want to increase/decrease flash output, just use the exposure compensation button or dial!! Pentax included the specific function in Z1p simply for used in program or auto mode, that is, only for one does not want to change the auto selected aperture/shutter value and merely want to change the flash output.
> Built-in flash rear courtain sync:
> MZ-S = no
> Z1p = yes
> SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
I think this is very very minor.
> External flash compensation:
> MZ-S = "no", (only with the new AF360 flash, WHEN it is launched)
> Z1p = yes, with many already existing Pentax TTL flashes
> SCORE: MZ-S =0 Z1p= 2
ditto, same case as above, just do the +/-EV directly.
> Simultaneous exposure and flash compensation:
> MZ-S = no
> Z1p = yes, either with the buit-in and external flash (VERY, VERY useful)
> SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 2
The answer is YES for MZ-S, and by default!!
> Sync. speed:
> MZ-S = 1/180
> Z1p = 1/250
> SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
I also really disappointed about this, that means I can't use 200mm telephoto lens for daylight fill flash if there is no 360G!?
> PC terminal:
> MZ-S = yes
> Z1p = no, (but I put one on my PZ1p}
> SCORE: MZ-S = 1 Z1p= 0
How can you put one on Z1p? This sounds really interesting.. Technical modifications by technician? or by adaptor?
> Batteries (life and prices):
> MZ-S = highly consuming of extremely expensive batteries CR2
> Z1p = moderate consuming of moderate price 2CR5
> SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Pop Photo reported that with 50% use of flash, they can shoot about 15 rolls of 24 exp. film. I think this is a reasonable figure.
> Built-in flash GN:
> MZ-S= GN 12
> Z1p = GN 14
> SCORE= MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Not much difference in actual use as both 12 and 14 are small figures.
but MZ-S RTF covers 24 and Z1p cover 28, according to pentax's spec.
Pop Photo mentioned that when using RTF at 24mm, there are dark corners in the photo.
> Built-in flash focus help:
> MZ-S = emits shorts flashes to iluminate the subject, very distracting
> Z1p = emits red beam to hekp focus, more discrete
> SCORE = MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1/2
I also prefer red beam, so one can better use external flash unit if available.
> Button to lock speed:
> MZ-S = yes (it is useful)
> Z1p = no
> SCORE: MZ-S = 1 Z1p = 0
But I think the "Hold" button is of no use!
> Mirror:
> MZ-S = slow, you can loose action shoots
> Z1p = faster
> SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Pop Photo tested the MZ-S system time lag is 1/10sec which is faster than Z-1p! I think mirror-up slow does not imply all the things, maybe shutter open very immediately after mirror up?
> Exposure modes:
> MZ-S = the convencional 4, using the aperture ring. Goog position of the button for exposure reset mode
> Z1p = 4 exposure modes, plus 250 syn, plus Hypermanual (a must), easiest "B" selection" , AND when in Hypermanual the aperture is constante in a zoom with any focal distance.
> SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Agree! I like to control aperture at the body! and i love Hyper-manual!
> Maximum speed:
> MZ-S = 1/6000
> Z1p = 1/8000
> SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Not much difference practically.
> Final Score : MZ-S = 8,5 Z1p = 15,5
You may adjust the final score now! (if my aboves are correct. Folks, pls correct me if i am wrong!)
Ответ Чемберлену одного из пользователей. Может кто чего добавит?
Just read test report of the Popular Photography - November issue, PLUS my own findings about the flash exposure compensation functions, here are somethings worth to mention:-
> Viewfinder:
> MZ-S = too small, it seems you are photographing with a point-and-shoot camera
> Z1p = more confortable and bigger image.
> SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Actual image area coverage by the viewfinder of
MZ-S = 93%, Z1p = 87% and Z1p's finder is a little bit brighter
> Built-in flash compensation:
> MZ-S = no
> Z1p = yes, selectabte +/- 1/2 stop, VERY useful, since the Pentax flashes tends to overexposure.
> SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 2
I believe that all pentax AF SLR can do this, SIMPLY USE the exposure compensation button or dial!! Unbelieveable?
Both my two Pentax AF SLRs (MZ-30 and SFX) CAN DO flash exposure compensation. I had tested by using my delicated flash unit AF240FT
The test is very simple. I fired the flash to a plain wall at a certain distance in dark environment and check if the "correct exposure" indication lamp was lit up, after that I set the exposure compensation to "over", say +4EV. So, what're the results? The "correct exposure" indication lamp didn't light up then. What does this imply? => Flash Exposure Compensation is in action!
SO, if you want to increase/decrease flash output, just use the exposure compensation button or dial!! Pentax included the specific function in Z1p simply for used in program or auto mode, that is, only for one does not want to change the auto selected aperture/shutter value and merely want to change the flash output.
> Built-in flash rear courtain sync:
> MZ-S = no
> Z1p = yes
> SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
I think this is very very minor.
> External flash compensation:
> MZ-S = "no", (only with the new AF360 flash, WHEN it is launched)
> Z1p = yes, with many already existing Pentax TTL flashes
> SCORE: MZ-S =0 Z1p= 2
ditto, same case as above, just do the +/-EV directly.
> Simultaneous exposure and flash compensation:
> MZ-S = no
> Z1p = yes, either with the buit-in and external flash (VERY, VERY useful)
> SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 2
The answer is YES for MZ-S, and by default!!
> Sync. speed:
> MZ-S = 1/180
> Z1p = 1/250
> SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
I also really disappointed about this, that means I can't use 200mm telephoto lens for daylight fill flash if there is no 360G!?
> PC terminal:
> MZ-S = yes
> Z1p = no, (but I put one on my PZ1p}
> SCORE: MZ-S = 1 Z1p= 0
How can you put one on Z1p? This sounds really interesting.. Technical modifications by technician? or by adaptor?
> Batteries (life and prices):
> MZ-S = highly consuming of extremely expensive batteries CR2
> Z1p = moderate consuming of moderate price 2CR5
> SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Pop Photo reported that with 50% use of flash, they can shoot about 15 rolls of 24 exp. film. I think this is a reasonable figure.
> Built-in flash GN:
> MZ-S= GN 12
> Z1p = GN 14
> SCORE= MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Not much difference in actual use as both 12 and 14 are small figures.
but MZ-S RTF covers 24 and Z1p cover 28, according to pentax's spec.
Pop Photo mentioned that when using RTF at 24mm, there are dark corners in the photo.
> Built-in flash focus help:
> MZ-S = emits shorts flashes to iluminate the subject, very distracting
> Z1p = emits red beam to hekp focus, more discrete
> SCORE = MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1/2
I also prefer red beam, so one can better use external flash unit if available.
> Button to lock speed:
> MZ-S = yes (it is useful)
> Z1p = no
> SCORE: MZ-S = 1 Z1p = 0
But I think the "Hold" button is of no use!
> Mirror:
> MZ-S = slow, you can loose action shoots
> Z1p = faster
> SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Pop Photo tested the MZ-S system time lag is 1/10sec which is faster than Z-1p! I think mirror-up slow does not imply all the things, maybe shutter open very immediately after mirror up?
> Exposure modes:
> MZ-S = the convencional 4, using the aperture ring. Goog position of the button for exposure reset mode
> Z1p = 4 exposure modes, plus 250 syn, plus Hypermanual (a must), easiest "B" selection" , AND when in Hypermanual the aperture is constante in a zoom with any focal distance.
> SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Agree! I like to control aperture at the body! and i love Hyper-manual!
> Maximum speed:
> MZ-S = 1/6000
> Z1p = 1/8000
> SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Not much difference practically.
> Final Score : MZ-S = 8,5 Z1p = 15,5
You may adjust the final score now! (if my aboves are correct. Folks, pls correct me if i am wrong!)
#24052 MZ-S vs Z1p
Отправлено от
в 05 November 2001 - 16:33
in
Пленочные камеры с байонетом K
Взято с Pentax Forum, если кто не видел.
Here are some comparisons and coments about the two cameras:
(You?ll be surprised!)
Autofoccus:
MZ-S = 6 points, not faster or slower than Z1p, the camera DO NOT choose the closest subject (for my surprise) but the easiest to focus (the more contrasty,it seems} You can chose and fix one of the points to focus and program the camera to use the adjacent point it necessary.
Z1p = 1 point of autofocus, you have to point do the subject and reframe for not centered subjects. In a rush this can make you loose a photo.
SCORE: MZ-S= 1 Z1p= 0
DOF Preview:
MZ-S = on the shutter buton, very confortable, works even with the aperture ring set in "A".
Z1p = on an specific button (no big deal) but dont work properly with the aperture ring set in "A".
SCORE: MZ-S= 1 Z1p= 0
Exposure compensation:
MZ-S = direct dial, first level, +- 3 stops, faster to use (but how importante is speed in this case?). It shows in the viewfinder.
Z1p = second level menu, but easy to use, +- 3 stops. It shows in the viewfinder and on the display.
SCORE: MZ-S = 1/2 Z1p = 0
Exposure data imprinting:
MZ-S = yes,(I found it useful)
Z1p = no
SCORE : MZ-S= 1 Z1p= 0
Size and weigh:
MZ-S = smaller and light
Z1p = bigger and heavier than the MZ-S, but not that much. But have better ergonomics.
SCORE: Neutral
Viewfinder:
MZ-S = too small, it seems you are photographing with a point-and-shoot camera
Z1p = more confortable and bigger image.
SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Film wind:
MZ-S = 2,5 frames per second
Z1p = 4 frames per second (I never have to use)
SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Film rewind:
MZ-S = faster enough, reasanable silent
Z1p = faster enough, VERY noisy
SCORE: MZ-S = 1 Z1p = 0
Multiple exposure:
MZ-S = no limits of shoots, you can turn off the camera between shots.(I found it very useful)
Z1p = 9 shots, if you turn off the camera the film will advance.
SCORE: MZ-S = 1 Z1p =0
Brackting:
MZ-S = direct dial, +/- 1, +/- 1/2 stop; can be used together with exposure compensation
Z1p = second level menu, but easy to use, +/-1, +/1/2 or +/1 1/3 of stop, can be used with exposure compensation.
SCORE: Neutral
Built-in flash compensation:
MZ-S = no
Z1p = yes, selectabte +/- 1/2 stop, VERY useful, since the Pentax flashes tends to overexposure.
SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 2
Built-in flash rear courtain sync:
MZ-S = no
Z1p = yes
SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
External flash compensation:
MZ-S = "no", (only with the new AF360 flash, WHEN it is launched)
Z1p = yes, with many already existing Pentax TTL flashes
SCORE: MZ-S =0 Z1p= 2
Simultaneous exposure and flash compensation:
MZ-S = no
Z1p = yes, either with the buit-in and external flash (VERY, VERY useful)
SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 2
Sync. speed:
MZ-S = 1/180
Z1p = 1/250
SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
PC terminal:
MZ-S = yes
Z1p = no, (but I put one on my PZ1p}
SCORE: MZ-S = 1 Z1p= 0
Batteries (life and prices):
MZ-S = highly consuming of extremely expensive batteries CR2
Z1p = moderate consuming of moderate price 2CR5
SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Built-in flash GN:
MZ-S= GN 12
Z1p = GN 14
SCORE= MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Built-in flash focus help:
MZ-S = emits shorts flashes to iluminate the subject, very distracting
Z1p = emits red beam to hekp focus, more discrete
SCORE = MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1/2
Button to lock speed:
MZ-S = yes (it is useful)
Z1p = no
SCORE: MZ-S = 1 Z1p = 0
Noise:
MZ-S = more silent
Z1p = a bit noisy
SCORE = MZ-S = 1 Z1p = 0
Mirror:
MZ-S = slow, you can loose action shoots
Z1p = faster
SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Exposure modes:
MZ-S = the convencional 4, using the aperture ring. Goog position of the button for exposure reset mode
Z1p = 4 exposure modes, plus 250 syn, plus Hypermanual (a must), easiest "B" selection" , AND when in Hypermanual the aperture is constante in a zoom with any focal distance.
SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Maximum speed:
MZ-S = 1/6000
Z1p = 1/8000
SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Multi segment metering:
MZ-S = six segments, tends do overexposure slightly
Z1p = eight segments, VERY accurate metering.
SCORE : MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Compatible lenses, usable film, power zoom:
similar on both cameras
Final Score : MZ-S = 8,5 Z1p = 15,5
Тем не менее куплю скоро MZ-S. Одурманен, что делать. Да Z1p у меня не было никогда...
Here are some comparisons and coments about the two cameras:
(You?ll be surprised!)
Autofoccus:
MZ-S = 6 points, not faster or slower than Z1p, the camera DO NOT choose the closest subject (for my surprise) but the easiest to focus (the more contrasty,it seems} You can chose and fix one of the points to focus and program the camera to use the adjacent point it necessary.
Z1p = 1 point of autofocus, you have to point do the subject and reframe for not centered subjects. In a rush this can make you loose a photo.
SCORE: MZ-S= 1 Z1p= 0
DOF Preview:
MZ-S = on the shutter buton, very confortable, works even with the aperture ring set in "A".
Z1p = on an specific button (no big deal) but dont work properly with the aperture ring set in "A".
SCORE: MZ-S= 1 Z1p= 0
Exposure compensation:
MZ-S = direct dial, first level, +- 3 stops, faster to use (but how importante is speed in this case?). It shows in the viewfinder.
Z1p = second level menu, but easy to use, +- 3 stops. It shows in the viewfinder and on the display.
SCORE: MZ-S = 1/2 Z1p = 0
Exposure data imprinting:
MZ-S = yes,(I found it useful)
Z1p = no
SCORE : MZ-S= 1 Z1p= 0
Size and weigh:
MZ-S = smaller and light
Z1p = bigger and heavier than the MZ-S, but not that much. But have better ergonomics.
SCORE: Neutral
Viewfinder:
MZ-S = too small, it seems you are photographing with a point-and-shoot camera
Z1p = more confortable and bigger image.
SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Film wind:
MZ-S = 2,5 frames per second
Z1p = 4 frames per second (I never have to use)
SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Film rewind:
MZ-S = faster enough, reasanable silent
Z1p = faster enough, VERY noisy
SCORE: MZ-S = 1 Z1p = 0
Multiple exposure:
MZ-S = no limits of shoots, you can turn off the camera between shots.(I found it very useful)
Z1p = 9 shots, if you turn off the camera the film will advance.
SCORE: MZ-S = 1 Z1p =0
Brackting:
MZ-S = direct dial, +/- 1, +/- 1/2 stop; can be used together with exposure compensation
Z1p = second level menu, but easy to use, +/-1, +/1/2 or +/1 1/3 of stop, can be used with exposure compensation.
SCORE: Neutral
Built-in flash compensation:
MZ-S = no
Z1p = yes, selectabte +/- 1/2 stop, VERY useful, since the Pentax flashes tends to overexposure.
SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 2
Built-in flash rear courtain sync:
MZ-S = no
Z1p = yes
SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
External flash compensation:
MZ-S = "no", (only with the new AF360 flash, WHEN it is launched)
Z1p = yes, with many already existing Pentax TTL flashes
SCORE: MZ-S =0 Z1p= 2
Simultaneous exposure and flash compensation:
MZ-S = no
Z1p = yes, either with the buit-in and external flash (VERY, VERY useful)
SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 2
Sync. speed:
MZ-S = 1/180
Z1p = 1/250
SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
PC terminal:
MZ-S = yes
Z1p = no, (but I put one on my PZ1p}
SCORE: MZ-S = 1 Z1p= 0
Batteries (life and prices):
MZ-S = highly consuming of extremely expensive batteries CR2
Z1p = moderate consuming of moderate price 2CR5
SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Built-in flash GN:
MZ-S= GN 12
Z1p = GN 14
SCORE= MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Built-in flash focus help:
MZ-S = emits shorts flashes to iluminate the subject, very distracting
Z1p = emits red beam to hekp focus, more discrete
SCORE = MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1/2
Button to lock speed:
MZ-S = yes (it is useful)
Z1p = no
SCORE: MZ-S = 1 Z1p = 0
Noise:
MZ-S = more silent
Z1p = a bit noisy
SCORE = MZ-S = 1 Z1p = 0
Mirror:
MZ-S = slow, you can loose action shoots
Z1p = faster
SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Exposure modes:
MZ-S = the convencional 4, using the aperture ring. Goog position of the button for exposure reset mode
Z1p = 4 exposure modes, plus 250 syn, plus Hypermanual (a must), easiest "B" selection" , AND when in Hypermanual the aperture is constante in a zoom with any focal distance.
SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Maximum speed:
MZ-S = 1/6000
Z1p = 1/8000
SCORE: MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Multi segment metering:
MZ-S = six segments, tends do overexposure slightly
Z1p = eight segments, VERY accurate metering.
SCORE : MZ-S = 0 Z1p = 1
Compatible lenses, usable film, power zoom:
similar on both cameras
Final Score : MZ-S = 8,5 Z1p = 15,5
Тем не менее куплю скоро MZ-S. Одурманен, что делать. Да Z1p у меня не было никогда...
#20304 Анонс MZ-6
Отправлено от
в 30 October 2001 - 09:58
in
Пленочные камеры с байонетом K
На sight.ru опять баллон на Pentax покатили... Ухожу на фронт.
